DP vs Regi og ære

Hvem bør få mest ære for komposisjonen i en spillefilm ? Svaret for de fleste er vel gitt; dette variere ekstremt avhengig av prosjekt og type regissører. Det er likevel verdt en liten debatt

Presidenten i ASC – artikkel ved siden av – har et innlegg rundt dette og en debatt startes på
på nofilmschool.com;

The other day, I overheard someone say that Steve McQueen’s cinematography in 12 Years A Slave was brilliant. As a huge fan of Sean Bobbitt (the actual cinematographer of that film), I wanted to say something, but held my tongue because avoiding the argument that would have ensued seemed like a better option. Despite my inaction, this instance got me thinking about our shared cultural view of film directors, and about whether or not that view needs to change.

On film sets, the director is often the head honcho, the creative decision-maker, the be-all end-all in the creative process. As such, the director tends to get all of, or at least a vast majority of the credit. They’re almost always viewed as the sole creative force behind a film, especially by people who aren’t involved in (or have knowledge of) the filmmaking process.

However, filmmaking, by its very nature, is a collaborative medium. Creating a convincing and compelling narrative feature can take hundreds of dedicated individuals working towards a common goal. Many of those individuals — the art directors, the makeup artists, the cinematographers, the VFX artists, the editors — are true artists in their own right, and their contributions to any given film are substantial at the very least. This raises a question that I’d love to toss out to the No Film School community for discussion: Do directors get too much credit in the filmmaking process?

Before we get to the discussion, I’d like to elaborate on some of my thoughts regarding this complex question. I certainly don’t claim to have any answers, but having thought about this a lot, I can at least point out a few different facets that might swing an answer in one way or another.

First up is the notion of the auteur, or the idea that a film is the sole creative vision of the director, as if he were the “author” of the film. This is the theory that permeates not only the vast majority of the filmmaking community, but also the entirety of our society. Nobody ever says, “Hey, let’s go see a collective work of art made by a group of talented creative professionals.” They say, “Let’s go see that new Tarantino flick,” or “I just loooooooove Steven Spielberg movies!” Film directors, at least the monetarily successful ones, are celebrities.

But let’s talk for a moment about what directors actually do in the filmmaking process. In the most basic sense, the director is a creative manager. They work with department heads in order to create a unified vision throughout all of the various facets of filmmaking. So in that sense, the director is the glue that holds everything together. As such, it stands to reason that they deserve some serious credit for being the driving force behind the film’s vision. There’s no doubt in my mind that directors serve an absolutely essential function on a film set. Perhaps even the most essential function (although there’s a strong case for producers).

Here’s the catch. Not all directors manage to the same extent. On one hand, many of them try to micro-manage every single department in an effort to maintain their “artistic vision.” On the other, some of them are primarily concerned with working with the actors in an effort to maximize performance. The issue here is that, without an in-depth knowledge of the director’s involvement in the pre-production, production, and post-production processes, it’s impossible to determine the extent to which a director’s “personal vision” has actually been translated to the final product that makes it to the screen.

les mer her

Siste innlegg
Nordic/Docs arrangeres i Fredrikstad denne uka. Dette er ellevte utgaven av den internasjonale dokumentarfilmfestivalen. Foreningen Norske Filmfotografer har i mange (..)
Tidligere studenter ved Den norske filmskolen. Foto: Kjell Vassdal FNF
Foreningen norske filmfotografer (FNF) har grundig behandlet rapporten, datert 9. juni 2023, ført i pennen av Eli Bø, Dekan ved (..)
Budbreingeren_Bilde_Liggende_OPFF logo
Pål Sletaunes prisvinnende debutfilm «Budbringeren» vises 1 .september kl 18.00 på Vega kino, under filmfestivalen Oslo Pix. Etter filmen blir det (..)
In December 2022 FNF did a camera test on the new ARRI Alexa 35 camera. We compared ARRIs latest camera (..)
Den norske filmskolen, i samarbeid med Xvision, tilbyr i høst et praktisk kurs innen virtuell produksjon rettet mot profesjonelle filmfotografer (..)
Gratulerer med 75-årsdagen Rolv Håan! Rolv har vært styreleder i Foreningen Norske Filmfotografer i to omganger. Han har også vært (..)
Paul René Roestad FNF fotografert på Storyline Studios i forbindelse med ODCC 2023.
Gratulerer med 75-årsdagen Paul René Roestad! Paul René er styreleder i Foreningen Norske Filmfotografer og primus motor bak både Oslo (..)
Bildekavalkade ODCC 2023
Vår svenske venn Lars Pettersson har laget denne bildekavalkaden fra Oslo Digital Cinema Conference 2023. Bildene er tatt av Lars (..)
Oslo Digital Cinema Conference gikk av stabelen forrige helg. Det var ganske bra besøk til tross for det pene sommerværet (..)
Onsdag 7. mars arrangerte FNF overraskelsesfest for Patrik Säfström hos Olga Rental. Filmfotografen flytter til Japan 1. august. Gjennom god (..)
  Vi er meget glade for at Greig Fraser kommer til Oslo for å holde en mesterklasse samt Q&A med (..)
Fredag 16. til søndag 18. juni arrangeres Oslo Digital Cinema Conference for åttende gang. ODCC er et samarbeid mellom FNF, (..)