DP vs Regi og ære

Hvem bør få mest ære for komposisjonen i en spillefilm ? Svaret for de fleste er vel gitt; dette variere ekstremt avhengig av prosjekt og type regissører. Det er likevel verdt en liten debatt

Presidenten i ASC – artikkel ved siden av – har et innlegg rundt dette og en debatt startes på
på nofilmschool.com;

The other day, I overheard someone say that Steve McQueen’s cinematography in 12 Years A Slave was brilliant. As a huge fan of Sean Bobbitt (the actual cinematographer of that film), I wanted to say something, but held my tongue because avoiding the argument that would have ensued seemed like a better option. Despite my inaction, this instance got me thinking about our shared cultural view of film directors, and about whether or not that view needs to change.

On film sets, the director is often the head honcho, the creative decision-maker, the be-all end-all in the creative process. As such, the director tends to get all of, or at least a vast majority of the credit. They’re almost always viewed as the sole creative force behind a film, especially by people who aren’t involved in (or have knowledge of) the filmmaking process.

However, filmmaking, by its very nature, is a collaborative medium. Creating a convincing and compelling narrative feature can take hundreds of dedicated individuals working towards a common goal. Many of those individuals — the art directors, the makeup artists, the cinematographers, the VFX artists, the editors — are true artists in their own right, and their contributions to any given film are substantial at the very least. This raises a question that I’d love to toss out to the No Film School community for discussion: Do directors get too much credit in the filmmaking process?

Before we get to the discussion, I’d like to elaborate on some of my thoughts regarding this complex question. I certainly don’t claim to have any answers, but having thought about this a lot, I can at least point out a few different facets that might swing an answer in one way or another.

First up is the notion of the auteur, or the idea that a film is the sole creative vision of the director, as if he were the “author” of the film. This is the theory that permeates not only the vast majority of the filmmaking community, but also the entirety of our society. Nobody ever says, “Hey, let’s go see a collective work of art made by a group of talented creative professionals.” They say, “Let’s go see that new Tarantino flick,” or “I just loooooooove Steven Spielberg movies!” Film directors, at least the monetarily successful ones, are celebrities.

But let’s talk for a moment about what directors actually do in the filmmaking process. In the most basic sense, the director is a creative manager. They work with department heads in order to create a unified vision throughout all of the various facets of filmmaking. So in that sense, the director is the glue that holds everything together. As such, it stands to reason that they deserve some serious credit for being the driving force behind the film’s vision. There’s no doubt in my mind that directors serve an absolutely essential function on a film set. Perhaps even the most essential function (although there’s a strong case for producers).

Here’s the catch. Not all directors manage to the same extent. On one hand, many of them try to micro-manage every single department in an effort to maintain their “artistic vision.” On the other, some of them are primarily concerned with working with the actors in an effort to maximize performance. The issue here is that, without an in-depth knowledge of the director’s involvement in the pre-production, production, and post-production processes, it’s impossible to determine the extent to which a director’s “personal vision” has actually been translated to the final product that makes it to the screen.

les mer her

Siste innlegg
Odd Geir Sæther, FNF. Bilde hentet fra Cinematekets katalog.
Regissør Trygve Hagen har laget dokumentarfilm om filmfotograf Odd Geir Sæther. Filmen vises på Cinemateket i Oslo lørdag 13. april (..)
Paul René Roestad IMAGO Honorary Member
IMAGO, The International Federation of Cinematographers, holdt sitt årsmøte og generalforsamling i London 14. og 15. februar. Mer enn 50 (..)
Publikum Mandagsfilmen "Narvik"  Frogner kino. Foto. P.R. Roestad FNF
FNF Mandagsfilmen er tilbake førstkommende mandag. Da viser vi Thea Hvistendahls spillefilmdebut «Håndtering av udøde» fotografert av Pål Ulvik Rokseth (..)
DSCF7875
Fredag 2. februar ble det avholdt Årsmøte i Foreningen norske filmfotografer. Årsmøtet er FNFs generalforsamling og øverste myndighet. Regnskapet for (..)
DSCF7721
Lørdag 13. januar 2024 arrangerte den franske filmfotograf-foreningen AFC workshop i Paris. Filmfotograf Ole Andreas Grøntvedt FNF og colorist Christian (..)
DSCF5265
Foreningen norske filmfotografer legger bak seg et år med stor aktivitet. Blant høydepunktene var Oslo Digital Cinema Conference som gjorde (..)
DSCF7140
Lørdag 9. desember arrangerte vi mesterklasse med den amerikanske filmfotografen Ellen Kuras ASC på Filmens hus i Oslo. Dette ble (..)
18x6 meter LED-vegg fra Xvision rigget i Kryptons studio. Egen LED-skjerm i himlingen som kan heves/senkes. Foto: Bjørn Ståle Bratberg, FNF
Den norske filmskolen arrangerte kurs i virtuell produksjon fra 14.-16.november. Kurset ble avholdt i Filmskolens lokaler på Myrens verksted i (..)
f0cd1516-45b7-4dc5-abc3-dbd7629f4c60
Filmfestivalen Camerimage ble arrangert fra 11. til 18. november. Benjamin Loeb FNF var representert i sideprogrammet med «Dream Scenario» (2023) (..)
MV5BNmZhMDZkNjUtZGU3MC00MTBlLThhNDQtMmExN2UxMzAzZDFmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzUzMDY0NDI@._V1_
Ragnar Lasse Henriksen FNF vant Sølvbjørnen i Berlin for sitt fotoarbeid på det som skulle bli hans eneste utgitte spillefilm. (..)
Ellen-Kuras-Featured
I samarbeid med Dokumentarkonventet har Foreningen norske filmfotografer fått selveste Ellen Kuras ASC over til Norge for to mesterklasser: Lørdag (..)
DSCF5755
Tredje utgave av Mirage Film Festival for the Art of the Real er akkurat ferdig. Festivalen er unik i sitt (..)